AIR POLLUTION IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC IN 2007
Czech Hydrometeorological Institute - Air Quality Protection Division




 LIST OF FIGURES
 
Fig. –1 Scheme of ISKO’s links to data sources and co-operating systems 2007
Fig. I.1 Total emissions of basic pollutants in the Czech Republic between 1990 and 2007
Fig. I.2 Changes in types of fuels in the REZZO 1 sources between 1990 and 2006 (shares of heat contained in the fuel)
Fig. I.3 Fuel consumption in REZZO 3 sources, 1992–2007
Fig. I.4 Changes in residential heating – comparison of 1991, 2000 and 2007
Fig. I.5 Changes in REZZO 3 emission quantities at constant structure of flats and fuels (100 % = average for 2001–2005)
Fig. I.6 Nitrogen oxides emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2006
Fig. I.7 Emission density of total suspended particles from 5x5 km squares, 2006
Fig. I.8 Sulphur dioxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2006
Fig. I.9 Carbon monoxide emission density from 5x5 km squares, 2006
Fig. II.1.1 Major station networks of ambient air quality monitoring, 2007
Fig. II.1.2 Monitoring of basic pollutants in selected organisations – development
Fig. II.4.1.1 PM10 air pollution characteristics for monitoring stations and basic characteristics of meteorological conditions in the winter periods (October–March), 2003–2008, Prague agglomeration
Fig. II.4.1.2 Annual course of monthly NO2 concentrations at selected AMS stations, Prague 2007
Fig. II.4.1.3 Dependence of average daily PM10 concentrations in Prague on dispersion conditions, 2003–2007
Fig. II.4.1.4 The number of days according to the degrees of dispersion conditions with average daily PM10 concentrations exceeding 50 μg.m-3 and 100 μg.m-3, 2000–2007
Fig. II.4.1.5 Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Prague agglomeration, 2007
Fig. II.4.1.6 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Prague agglomeration, 2007
Fig. II.4.1.7 The development of the 36th highest 24-hour PM10 concentration and average annual temperature, 2000–2007
Fig. II.4.1.8 Dependence of PM10 on temperature, 2000–2007
Fig. II.4.1.9 Number of exceedances of the 24-hour PM10 limit value in the winter months in relation with the average temperature of the winter period in Brno-Tuřany locality
Fig. II.4.1.10 Influence of monthly temperature on the number of 24-hour PM10 limit value exceedances in the given month in Mikulov-Sedlec locality, 2004–2005
Fig. II.4.1.11 Influence of temperature on PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations, Brno-Tuřany, 2000–2007
Fig. II.4.1.12 Influence of temperature on SO2, NO2 and O3 concentrations, Mikulov-Sedlec, 2000–2007
Fig. II.4.1.13 Influence of temperature on SO2, NO2 and O3 concentrations, Brno-Kroftova, 2000–2007
Fig. II.4.1.14 Influence of temperature on O3 concentrations, Mikulov-Sedlec, 2000–2007
Fig. II.4.1.15 Influence of temperature on benzo(a)pyrene concentration, Brno-Kroftova, 2004–2007
Fig. II.4.1.16 Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Brno agglomeration, 2007
Fig. II.4.1.17 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Brno agglomeration, 2007
Fig. II.4.1.18 Average monthly concentrations of PM10, NO2, SO2, O3 and CO from the stations in the Ostrava-Karviná area
Fig. II.4.1.19 Ambient air pollution caused by PM10 particles in the city of Ostrava in winter periods 2001/2002–2007/2008
Fig. II.4.1.20 Average meteorological characteristics in winter periods 2001/2002–2007/2008
Fig. II.4.1.21 Dependence of average PM10 concentrations on meteorological characteristics in winter period
Fig. II.4.1.22 Relative frequencies of the derived daily airflow types
Fig. II.4.1.23 Average values of meteorological characteristics in dependence on daily airflow types
Fig. II.4.1.24 Average daily PM10 concentrations and relative frequencies of PM10 daily concentrations >50 μg.m-3 in winter period on the days with the respective daily airflow types
Fig. II.4.1.25 Field of the annual concentration of NO2, Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, 2007
Fig. II.4.1.26 Field of the annual concentration of benzo(a)pyrene, Moravian-Silesian agglomeration, 2007
Fig. II.4.1.27 Annual average PM10 concentration, Ústí nad Labem Region, 2003–2007
Fig. II.4.1.28 36th highest 24-hour PM10 concentration and number of LV exceedances, Ústí nad Labem Region, 2003–2007
Fig. II.4.1.29 Number of days per year divided according to four degrees of dispersion conditions, Krušné hory Mts. area, 2003–2007
Fig. II.4.1.30 The number of episodes with deteriorated and unfavourable conditions lasting four and more days and the total number of days within these episodes
Fig. II.4.1.31 Average 24-hour PM10, concentrations, temperature and dispersion conditions, Ústí nad Labem Region, 2003–2007
Fig. II.4.1.32 Trends of SO2, PM10, NO2 and CO annual characteristics in agglomerations, 1996–2007
Fig. II.4.2.1 4th highest 24-hour concentrations and maximum hourly concentrations of SO2 in 1996–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.2 Field of the 4th highest 24-hour concentration of SO2 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.3 Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of SO2 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.4 Stations with the highest 24-hour concentrations of SO2 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.5 36th highest 24-hour concentrations and annual average concentrations of PM10 in 1996–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.6 Field of the 36th highest 24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.7 Field of annual average concentration of PM10 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.8 Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for 24-hour concentrations of PM10 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.9 Stations with the highest exceedance of LV for annual concentrations of PM10 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.10 Numbers of exceedances of air pollution limit value for the 24-hour concentration of PM10 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.11 Annual average PM10 concentrations at the stations with the exceedance of the limit value, 2002–2007
Fig. II.4.2.12 Annual average concentration of PM2.5 at stations in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.13 Average monthly PM2.5/PM10 ratio in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.14 Stations with the highest exceedance of the proposed LV for annual concentrations of PM2.5 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.15 Average annual PM10 concentration in Prague in dependence on dispersion conditions, 2000–2007
Fig. II.4.2.16 Spatial distribution of PM10 hourly concentrations, 23.3. 2007, 0:00–16:00
Fig. II.4.2.17 Daily course of PM10 measured on CHMI automated monitoring stations, 24.3.2007, hourly interval. The graphs show the maximum measured value and the time of its recording.
Fig. II.4.2.18 19th highest hourly concentrations and annual average concentrations of NO2 in 1996–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.19 Field of annual average concentration of NO2 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.20 Stations with the highest hourly concentrations of NO2 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.21 Stations with the highest exceedance of LV and LV+MT for annual concentrations of NO2 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.22 Maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 1996–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.23 Stations with the highest values of maximum 8-hour running average concentrations of CO in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.24 Annual average concentrations of benzene in 1998–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.25 Field of annual average concentration of benzene in the ambient air in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.26 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual benzene concentrations in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.27 26th highest values of maximum 8-hour running average of ground-level ozone concentrations (three-year average) in 1996–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.28 Field of the 26th highest maximum daily 8-hour running average of ground-level ozone concentrations in three-year average, 2005–2007
Fig. II.4.2.29 Numbers of exceedances of the target value for the maximum daily 8-hour running average of ground-level ozone concentrations in three-year average, 2005–2007
Fig. II.4.2.30 Stations with the highest values of maximum daily 8-hour running average concentrations of ground-level ozone in 2005–2007
Fig. II.4.2.31 Annual average concentrations of lead in the ambient air in 1996–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.32 1/14-day average concentrations of lead in the ambient air in 2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.33 Annual average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air in 1996–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.34 Field of annual average concentration of cadmium in the ambient air in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.35 1/14-day average concentrations of cadmium in the ambient air in 2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.36 Annual average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air in 1996–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.37 Field of annual average concentration of arsenic in the ambient air in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.38 1/14-day average concentrations of arsenic in the ambient air in 2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.39 Annual average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air in 1996–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.40 1/14-day average concentrations of nickel in the ambient air in 2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.41 Annual average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 1997–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.42 Field of annual average concentration of benzo(a)pyrene in the ambient air in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.43 Month average concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene at various types of localities, 2004–2007
Fig. II.4.2.44 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.45 Concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene and PM10 particles in individual localities, 2004–2007
Fig. II.4.2.46 Trends of SO2, PM10, NO2, NOx and O3 annual characteristics in the Czech Republic, 1996–2007
Fig. II.4.2.47 Annual average concentrations of SO2 in 1996–2007 at selected rural stations
Fig. II.4.2.48 Winter average concentrations of SO2 in 1996/1997–2007/2008 at selected rural stations
Fig. II.4.2.49 Field of annual average concentration of SO2 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.50 Field of average concentration of SO2 in the winter period 2007/2008
Fig. II.4.2.51 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of SO2 in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.52 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest winter concentrations of SO2 in the winter period 2007/2008
Fig. II.4.2.53 Annual average concentrations of NOx and NO2 in 1996–2007 at selected stations
Fig. II.4.2.54 Field of annual average concentration of NOx in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.55 24-hour concentrations at the stations with the highest annual concentrations of NOx in 2007
Fig. II.4.2.56 Exposure index AOT40 values of ozone in 1996–2007 at selected stations, average for 5 years
Fig. II.4.2.57 Field of exposure index AOT40 values, average for 5 years, 2003–2007
Fig. II.4.2.58 Stations with the highest exposure index AOT40 values in recent 5 years, 2003–2007
Fig. II.4.2.59 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection limit values, 2007
Fig. II.4.2.60 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection target values, ground-level ozone excluded, 2007
Fig. II.4.2.61 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to health protection target values, incl. ground-level ozone, 2007
Fig. II.4.2.62 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to ecosystems/vegetation protection limit values in national parks and protected landscape areas, ground-level ozone excluded, 2007
Fig. II.4.2.63 Areas with deteriorated air quality with regard to ecosystems/vegetation protection limit values in national parks and protected landscape areas, including ground-level ozone, 2007
Fig. II.5.1 Course of daily average air temperatures and the long-term normal, Prague-Libuš, 1.1.–28.2.2007
Fig. II.5.2 Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the station Prague 2-Legerova, 1.1.–28.2.2007
Fig. II.5.3 Average hourly NO2 concentrations at the station Prague 2-Legerova, 1.11.–31.12.2007
Fig. II.5.4 Course of maximum daily air temperatures, their normal and daily sums of precipitation at the station Prague-Libuš. Occurrence of ozone concentrations exceeding 180 μg.m-3 in the territory of the Czech Republic, 1.4.–30.9.2007
Fig. II.5.5 Spatial distribution of maximum daily hourly concentrations of ground-level ozone in the territory of the Czech Republic, 14.7.–22.7.2007
Fig. III.1 Station networks monitoring atmospheric precipitation quality and atmospheric deposition, 2007
Fig. III.2 Fields of annual wet deposition of sulphur (SO42- - S), 2007
Fig. III.3 Fields of annual dry deposition of sulphur (SO2 - S), 2007
Fig. III.4 Fields of annual total deposition of sulphur, 2007
Fig. III.5 Fields of annual throughfall deposition of sulphur, 2007
Fig. III.6 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NO3- - N), 2007
Fig. III.7 Fields of annual wet deposition of nitrogen (NH4+ - N), 2007
Fig. III.8 Fields of annual total wet deposition of nitrogen, 2007
Fig. III.9 Fields of annual dry deposition of nitrogen (NOx - N), 2007
Fig. III.10 Fields of annual total deposition of nitrogen, 2007
Fig. III.11 Fields of annual wet deposition of hydrogen ions, 2007
Fig. III.12 Fields of annual dry deposition of hydrogen ions corresponding to SO2 and NOx deposition, 2007
Fig. III.13 Fields of annual total deposition of hydrogen ions, 2007
Fig. III.14 Fields of annual wet deposition of fluoride ions, 2007
Fig. III.15 Fields of annual wet deposition of chloride ions, 2007
Fig. III.16 Fields of annual wet deposition of lead ions, 2007
Fig. III.17 Fields of annual dry deposition of lead, 2007
Fig. III.18 Fields of annual wet deposition of cadmium ions, 2007
Fig. III.19 Fields of annual dry deposition of cadmium, 2007
Fig. III.20 Fields of annual wet deposition of nickel ions, 2007
Fig. III.21 The development of annual deposition of sulphur (SO42–S, SO2–S) and oxidated forms of nitrogen (NO3-–N, NOx–N) and hydrogen in the Czech Republic, 1995–2007
Fig. III.22 The development of the ratio of nitrate/sulphate concentrations in atmospheric deposition (expressed as μeq. l-1) at the CHMI stations, 1998–2007
Fig. III.23 The development of annual wet deposition at selected stations in 1991–2007, Czech Republic